|
Monkey Sling -- Idea's and Opinions
Submitted by other Computer Folk
Freeware Equals Nowhere -non hatemail- ;)
Regarding this article, you are correct. Free is not where the internet will go.
Anybody that truly knows IT and what it takes to keep a network going should
realize that our $20/month contribution does nothing but pay for the phone line
we call in on. Likewise, if you are running cable or dsl you still are not
contributing to the needs of these companies upkeep. If a
person wants a true high speed internet connection, you will have to pay for it
in the end. Question I have regarding pop ups and spam, "Why don't
they appeal to me?" The only reason I take half a look at the x10 pop
ups is because they show a very attractive set of breasts, uh, ahem, I mean
woman. I have no desire for a low security wireless camera with poor
resolution.
Same thing with others, gambling, enlarging my penis, or consolidating my debt
with a company I couldn't even spell let alone recognize, why would I care to
click on the ads? That is what has gone to far. Why can't we have
pop ups like what is on TV? Kmart for mothers day. Buy your loved
one a dozen roses to let them know you love them. In my opinion, that's
where they go wrong with pop ups and spam. I realize they do occasionally
get somebody to click and purchase but who are those people?
Not the average Joe I'm sure.
Nate Bascue
Nice piece on Freeware...but:
There is a difference between a commune and a farm, where the masses are
nothing but sheep to be guided...and gilded. There is no reason why it
should take 2500+ programmers to spend 3 years and force...yes I said force...me
to use their software that doesn't work...lies to me...and when its done tell me
how to use it...and when I can.
I am not a flamer...nor did I sign up for the second coming of the OpenSource
savors. But let's be honest. What we have now is not free
enterprise...and it's not capitalism. It is nothing more than the farmer
shearing off his share of our money for stuff that you would never have bought
if there was free competition. I figure in a couple years all those guys
coding for free will get on the clue bus...and when the dust settles the big
farmers will understand that there is competition...and that they
need to put away the crack they are smoking and begin delivering an honest
product for an honest cost. Music, movies, software doesn't have to be
free...but it damn sure can be reasonable.
Tell the difference between the last Garth Brooks album...and the best selling
Creed album: yeah...about 2.2 million dollars. So...why shouldn't
that mp3 be free? Like those guys really need 2.2 million dollars.
Get a decent board...learn to play your instruments...and write some songs...and
you won't need to sell a CD for 18 bucks...cause it only cost you 5 grand to
record...and a buck to make. Get real. Everything else is that way
to. Why should I pay Microsoft for code they swiped from the OpenSource
community....did anyone pay attention to the opensource compression
vulnerability last year that also affect 11 Microsoft applications.
The point is that there is a compromise between free...and just plain
worthless.
Chris Louviere
From John DeVita, Network Designer from
California
I realize the purpose of your site is to be informative cutting edge and
humorous. I feel hesitant about submitting rants. Nobody likes a gripe page. If it is pessimistic, bitter and devoid of a
Dilbertian optimism then its not fun to read, unfortunately that is the nature of some of most rants.
Let me Introduce myself I am a Network Architect for a series of privately held financial companies as such I am responsible for making sure all of are networks follow the same scheme and end to end connectivity between all companies globally. I dictate a lot of policy regarding local network implementations as such I am constantly traveling and interacting with various somewhat redundant IS Depts.
During my day I am constantly interacting with Network Admins, engineers, technicians, MIS directors and programmers. Unfortunately I am finding the new breed of admin's and technicians wholly inadequate. If you think a paper MCSE is a problem, half the guys I run
across don't even have the intelligence, to pass it.
Lately what I am finding more and more of out of somewhat competent Admins is a total lack of even the fundamentals of TCP/IP. They know networking by plugging stuff into hubs and switches and changing domain settings inside of windows. I know of
Admins who think hubs operate like switches. I know of technicians who can't even build a god damn server, have never touched hardware raid or
scsi.
Their jobs don't require years and years of experience, They don't require certifications, It requires knowledge, analytical skills, logic and a willingness to solve the
!@#$ing problem. And my god what I am finding is that these guys couldn't trouble shoot their way out of a wet paper sack. Listen the thing that needs to get thru these peoples head's, is that you can have a promising IT
career if you are frickin bright. If you scored average through out high school, if math and science weren't your subjects then stay the hell out of IT.
If your still unemployed from the dot com meltdown of 2001, maybe you should be.
Send Flames to JohnDeVita@Hotmail.com
From B. Young concerning Unix
Well I am not really a Linux person, I'm a Unix person, That's why I use FreeBSD.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD are literal descendants of the OS that was used to
create the original Internet under contract to the DoD.
BSD users tend to have learned data processing at a text terminal, and we also
don't consider our OS to be a religious cause. You don't hear about FreeBSD all
the time because we are into substance, not hype. (and that isn't a put down on
linux perse). Linux uses the (in)?famous GPL License. All of the open source
BSDs use the BSD license, Which says in a few more
words "this software is truly freed, but copyrighted" and that's all.
In conclussion, Unix is a different way of looking at a computer and the work
that you program it to do. Windows is an abstraction of the underlying system
and is designed to give you methods of accessing the OS without allowing you to
access it directly. It doesn't require you to learn much to use it. For a home
user that just wants to take pictures of
the kids and email them to granma that is great. To someone that programs
parallel super computers, runs file servers, or builds embedded equipment, and
wants to tell the kernel to give some program more time on the CPU (AND JUST DO
IT) it is maddening. Strangely enough the Linux crowd seems to be trying to be
more like windows.
We have a saying:
Linux users hate windows,
*BSD users love unix.
Subject: MSFT Article - Well Said!
My feelings exactly! I would add that I am
still VERY pissed (pardon the professionalism) that MSFT waited until
October to make the announcement. I had taken off for 6 weeks, packed
the $2,000+ worth of study materials I'd purchased for the ultimate cram
session, and LITERALLY flew to a deserted Asian island halfway around the
world to study (sans cell phone). I'm an indie, so the cost to me in
terms of lost billable hours was @$20k+. 5 days gone and no way to get
an earlier flight back, I got the email. I was livid! Luckily, the
Thai massage I got later that day to ease the frustration had very
calming effect on the soul. (heheheh)
Anyway, write on! MCSE NT4ever!
--RJ
Russell Jackson
PS - Unless something more fantabulous happens
with XP, I am not recommending any of my NT4 clients to upgrade past W2K.
What's the point if W2K does the job well enough and then some?
Subject: Re: The Bitter Network Administrator
Hi, I looked at the nletter and it's well presented. My pard is a sysadmin
and he is always complaining that the Linux bandwagon is all people write about.
FreBSD has advantages over Linux for certain things and is better supported. why
don't you do an article on freeBSD? BTW where do you get your revenue -
it's not immediately obvious.
Jackie Mackay UK
Just a few questions for discussion. I hope
that you haven't already covered some of these. What do you think about
where the demand for technology is headed? Will there be a demand for
specialists or more generalists? Finally, do you think that we will face
a shortage of trained staff again and in what areas?
Personally, I have about two years of tech
experience but I think that I would be classified as just a paper MCSE.
However, I have moved on and I am working on a master's degree in management
information systems (MMIS).
Thanks for creating this site.
Thomas Kosevich
|
|