|
SCO Investor Demands Action or Money Back
Douglas Chick

According
to AP, BayStar Capital Management LLC, is threatening to withdraw its
financial support from the SCO Group, if the company doesn’t sharpen its
focus on the potentially lucrative legal fight. Furthermore they want SCO to
hire executives that are more knowledgeable in terms of intellectual
property and spend less of their time and money on its Unix products. Otherwise
BayStar will demand repayment of a $20 million loan.
Is
this what technology companies have been reduced to? Is the worth of a company
dependant on the value of its lawsuits?
Isn't
it true that tech
companies with no tangible value are what caused the Dot com crash along
with other technology companies in the first place? If the corporation is
only worth the value of its lawsuits then their stocks can only be as strong
as their attorney's track record. This could also mean that the financial
health of a country can only be measured by numbers on a court docket. It
all seems a bit out of control to me, but then again, I'm a simple man that
can be easily confused with big city accounting and lawyering.
According to
the same article,
BayStar has invested $745 million dollars in 160 companies, including XM
Satellite Radio, and this is the first time that BayStar has demanded its
money back. Perhaps BayStar is beginning to see that there isn't really the
pot of gold at the end of the rainbow that they were originally lead to
believe. Or even maybe, BayStar has a chief investor that is going impatient
and wants more action against companies that dare use Linux?
Like most of
you I ask questions that I couldn't possibly know the answers to. Still,
I'm not going to worry too much about what happens to SCO. They had already confirmed that Microsoft had introduced them to BayStar, and I’m
sure that if BayStar were to pull out Microsoft might suggest
several other introductions.
|