A Website Dedicated to Computer Professional...and some not so Professional

Another Bytes the Dust
John Devita


As an American national it gives me great pride to hear that China and Brazil have gone over to Linux. 20 years from now our entire concept of what is a computer will have changed, while we will be doing the unimaginable with new technology.  China & Brazil will still be using Linux when most of us will be reading about the Linux vs. Windows debate in a history book.

Another country down the tubes

I’m not plugging Microsoft, but imagine the impact on the US economy if in the early 80's the government made a mandate, and chose between CP/M, or VMS.  The dot-com revolution would never have happened, and we'd still be using one of those two operating systems. Either operating system would work fairly well and very reliably for a limited number of applications.  Chances are we never know what we were missing.

Making your country "Linux" only isn't a technical statement it’s a political one.  In fact, a socialist statement, "POWER TO THE PEOPLE" would take place. Unfortunately socialism thwarts progress and solidifies large institutions.  Examples of socialism solidifying the institutions and thwarting progress can be seen today and throughout history.  Corrupt royal oligarchies, (Most of South America), An indifferent elitist aristocracy was placed in charge of Germany under National Socialism. (Or even large corporate entities, present socialism in Germany and France). The workers still become @$$ monkeys to the power institutions.  Microsoft is becoming one of these institutions. 

Microsoft in years to come will become irrelevant if they stagnate and start to rely on using their corporate muscle instead of innovating.  Some will say they already are, others will contend that they are not.  The market will decide.  IBM was once an innovative dynamic fast reacting company. Say that today and most people will be waiting for a punch line.  Microsoft may soon share that fate, the ironic "victims of their own success".

As for "Open Source" vs. "Big Business"

"Big business" is a loaded word, often used to provoke emotional responses instead of logical ones.  Every time you hear the word big business thrown about, the person using it wants more regulations. The regulations only add barriers to entry, which thwart competition and innovation.  Open Source or free software has a place, and can be quite useful.  However one must remember free anything, does not exist except for charity and donations.  Free software developed by philanthropists will never match the quality, of software designed for pay.  It is not often that anyone receives better quality from a charity than from a paid effort.  Beggars can’t be choosers, consumers can be.

 




ComputerGeeks.com
Search Now:
 
In Association with Amazon.com